SSRC logo Meta-Analysis
Logo
Introduction
Searching
Critical Appraisal
Meta-analysis
Discussion
Useful Links
About Us
Contact Us
Slide Presentations
Site Search
Site Map
Introduction Searching Critical Appraisal Meta-analysis Discussion

Meta-analysis methods focus on contrasting and comparing results from different studies in anticipation of identifying consistent patterns and sources of disagreements among these results.

Primary objective

Synthetic goal (estimation of summary effect)
vs.
Analytic goal (estimation of differences)


In summarizing the results and facilitating their analysis,

  1. Key variables that characterize are:
    • Participants
    • Interventions
    • Outcomes
    • Internal validity of each study
  2. Results in natural units that are easily understood
  3. Standardized results, if these can be derived in a way that will facilitate comparisons across studies without being misleading.

Synthesis of data

Discrete (event):
Odds Ratio
(OR)
Relative Risk
(RR)
Risk Difference
(RD)
Continuous (measured):
Mean Difference
(MD)
Standardized Mean Difference
(SMD)


Absolute measures can be more informative than relative measures because they reflect the baseline risk as well as the change in risk with the intervention.

Absolute measures are useful for presenting results, but not for analysis
purposes.

Statistical models for calculating overall effects

Fixed effects model (FEM):
Assumes a common underlying effect behind every trial
Random effects model (REM):
Assume true effect estimates really vary across studies


Perform sensitivity and subgroup analyses if appropriate and possible. Subgroups should be pre-specified to avoid bias.

Perform a narrative, qualitative summary when data are too sparse, of too low quality or too heterogeneous to proceed with a meta-analysis.

Marjan Akbari Kamrani

Top of the page

   
   
  Copyright © 2003-2005 SSRC. All rights reserved. Site Map : Contact Us